Laurie’s FL activity 5: Designing and describing
flexible learning strategies
What is blended learning?
With
the increase of tertiary student numbers and the need for technology-based
education, educationalists need to deliver an optimal learning experience that
is effective and appropriate for students’ learning needs (McColgan & Rice,
2012). “Technology-based learning
increases flexibility in delivery and removes any geographical or time
constraints often associated with traditional face-to-face learning. Studies
have reviewed favourably the introduction of online or e-learning teaching
pedagogies “(McColgan & Rice, 2012, p.35). Blended learning includes
learning and teaching strategies that are computer and technologically based.
It includes strategies that are wholly computer and web based for distance
learning, but can also include various teaching methods that reinforce face to
face teaching and learning like the use of podcasts, network learning and
E-learning.
Sangra, Vlachopoulos and Cabrera (2012) define E-learning as “an approach to teaching and learning, representing all or part of the educational model applied, that is based on the use of electronic media and devices as tools for improving access to raining, communication and interaction and that facilitates the adoption of new ways of understanding”. It has also been defined as learning that combines online and face to face approaches (Heinze &Procter, 2004). Moule, Ward and Lockyer (2010) define E-learning as “any learning that uses information and communication technologies” (p.2786). The various approaches or teaching techniques/strategies are all based on, or are reliant on effective communication between the lecturer and the student. Various forms of communication can include; face to face (to groups through lectures, tutorials and individually at formative, summative assessment and one on one), email, cellphone texting, blogs, networking or discussion boards, and the use of other electronic devices. By using all types of communication, the lecturer can meet the learning needs of the majority of students and allows the student to work at their own pace (Moule, Ward & Lockyer (2010). McColgan and Rice (2012) found that the students had no problem with using the various forms of technology, however access was not always guaranteed. However Moule et al., (2010) found that poor computer literacy skills adversely affected learning outcomes.
The below
slide shows the different forms of E-learning (sorry no reference for this, I
downloaded it and then changed sites but couldn’t find it when I went back –
thank goodness this is a blog!!!)
(sorry, this slide didn't save onto my blog. i will forward it to anyone who is interested., Laurie)
Putting E-learning into a theoretical model Moule et al., (2010) produced the below figure
which shows the various methods of technology used in nursing education and identifies
the instructivist to constructivist approaches. “Instructivist learning theory, is a teacher–centred model of learning
that suggests knowledge exists independently of the student, and is taught by
the teacher to the student, who is considered as a passive recipient.
Constructivist theory is student rather than teacher focused. The student
constructs new knowledge through analysis of information and reference to
experience and understanding. The ladder base identifies e-learning applications
that give access to instructional material through to supporting constructivist
approaches to learning (p.2786).
E-learning
is not just about the method or medium used to teach, it needs to be
instructional by posing questions, problems or other interactional activities
(Clary n.d). The following strategies will be discussed individually.
Network learning:
Is a collaborative approach where students learn from a network of peers. Network
learning aims to promote an
environment where students are motivated with good communication and the
formation of a learning community, which allows for individual learning styles and approaches. Working
collaboratively is a precursor to team work which is essential in most nursing
practice. Moule et.al., (2010), found
in their research of nursing students that initially students were not active
in using this approach, but once they started using discussion boards found it
an excellent forum for their learning.
Email: this strategy I use on
a daily basis. It enables me to keep in close contact with my students at most
of the times. I now have an iPad which allows me to access my emails from home,
and both my work places. Currently the students (both 1st and 3rd
year) are expected to send me a reflection of their work on a weekly basis.
This allows me to see how they are going
and if they are meeting their learning goals and objectives. The down side of
this is that I don’t restrict my work time. It is not uncommon for me to be
reading students work and responding to them late in the evening from home….but
I suppose that is what being flexible and meeting the students’ needs is all
about.
Smartphones:
smartphones are the new generation cellphones. They have the capacity to access
web-based programmes and can be used to contribute to peer learning. Functions of smartphones include sending text messages,
viewing videos, and access to the Internet, and can be used to engage students
and reinforce learning at a time or location that suits the students. Smartphones can be used
for quick access to educational materials and guidelines during clinical
experience or class time. Students
can review educational videos and easily reach their clinical instructor via
text message. Students can also download
applications, subscriptions, and reference materials to enable their smartphone functions
even further
Blogs, twitter and other social media including
Facebook: This could be based on a simulation of a scenario
based in primary health care. a situation using actors (to protect personal
identity for clients) could be videotaped and placed onto a website (either
twitter or UTube) and each student would make comments adding from previous
students input to build a picture. Mistra (2011) found using twitter to teach
critical care nursing skills allowed the student nurses to be better prepared
for clinical placement in the Unit. Clifton and Mann (2011) found using UTube increased student engagement, critical awareness and facilitated
deep learning. Furthermore, these videos could be
accessed at any time of the day and from a place to suit the student.
Strategy
|
Content
|
Activity
|
Communication
|
Assessment
|
Network
learning
|
1st
year primary health care nursing students
|
Throughout
their clinical placement and writing a community profile
|
All
students can contribute to the community profile. Each person can take an
aspect of the community to profile and using video or cameras
|
Individual
contributions can be self-monitored
|
Email
|
Both
1st & 3rd year primary health students
|
Communication
between lecturer and student. Allows for continuous feedback for students
|
Students
send me their reflections on a weekly basis and I respond to them giving them
feedback on their work.
|
Allows
me to easily keep track of the students learning needs and an ability to give
them feedback in a timely manner.
|
Smartphones
|
1st
year students
|
Community
profile
|
Students
could work in a group to create a community profile. they could take photos
and post onto a blog or other network
|
Individual
contributions could be monitored
|
E
portfolios
|
3rd
year primary health students
|
Clinical
placement and summative assessments
|
Portfolios
could be sent directly to the lecturer to review and feedback on
|
Easily
assessed and timely feedback can be given.
|
Blogs
& twitter or other social media
|
1st
& 3rd year primary care students
|
Using
a clinical scenario on child development, students could build on the
scenario to identify if a child is meeting their milestones
|
Via
social media that would be limited to the student group and lecturer only
|
Individual
contributions can be seen by all participants. The students can
self-monitor.
|
Blended
Learning Strategies – Template; Bronwyn
Hegarty, Otago Polytechnic - 2011
References:
Clarey, J. (n.d). E-learning 101: an introduction to E-learning, learning tools and technologies presentation. Retrieved from; http://www.slideshare.net/edustudent3/e-learning-department-of-education-sargodha-university
Clarey, J. (n.d). E-learning 101: an introduction to E-learning, learning tools and technologies presentation. Retrieved from; http://www.slideshare.net/edustudent3/e-learning-department-of-education-sargodha-university
Christiansen, A., & Bell, A.
(2010).Peer learning partnerships: exploring the relationships of
pre-registration nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 18, 803-810.
Clifton, A., & Mann, C (2011). Can YouTube enhance student
nurse learning? Nurse Education Today. 31(4): 311-313.
Heinze, A. & C. Procter (2004).
Reflections on the use of blended learning]. Education in a Changing
Environment. University of Salford, Salford, Education Development Unit.
Retrieved fromhttp://www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/ah_04.rtf
.
McColgan, K., & Rice, C. (2012). An online training resource
for clinical supervision. Nursing
Standard. 26(24), 35-39.
Mistra, V. (2011).critical care training: Using Twitter as a
teaching tool. Journal of Critical Care
Nursing. 20 (20): 1292-1296.
Moule, P., Ward, R., & Lockyer, L. (2010). Nursing and
healthcare students’ experiences and use of e-learning in higher education. Journal
of Advanced Nursing. 66(12), 2785–2795.
Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building
an inclusive definition of E-learning:
An approach top the conceptual framework. International
Review of research in Open and
Distance Learning. Retrieved from; www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrod1/artcile/view/1161/2146.